Health activists mark question on Justice Bhandari
Justice Markandeya Katju of the Supreme Court
had withdrawn from hearing a patent dispute vitally concerning
pharmaceutical majors. Justice Dalveer Bhandari, the head of the bench
that has since been dealing with the case, is now under attack, this
time from health activists. Though he did not himself give any reason for it, Katju's recusal in 2009 from the appeal filed by Novartis
was then widely attributed to an article written by him in a legal
journal conceding, much to the embarrassment of multinational
companies, that "many of the medical drugs available in the market are
too costly for the poor people in India" and that "ways and means
should therefore be thought out for making these drugs available to the
masses at affordable prices".
In what seems virtually a
reversal of the situation, the health activists demanded on Monday, on
the eve of the next hearing of the case, that the government should
seek Justice Bhandari's recusal as he had participated in at least two
international conferences for judges organized by the US-based Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPOA), whose members include Novartis, among a host of pharmaceutical and IT giants.
The stated purpose of those conferences attended by Justice Bhandari in 2009 in Washington and this year in Brussels
was to help "intellectual property (IP) law attorneys and other
interested parties" get an opportunity to interact with judges from
around the world. In the 2009 conference, Justice Bhandari presented a
paper arguing that pharmaceutical MNCs should "educate people regarding
the importance of the protection of IP rights" and they should "make
all efforts to ensure that all countries are persuaded to enact proper
laws".
Alleging that "several statements in the paper could
be held to be in conflict with the intent and letter of the Indian
Patent Act", health activists wrote to three ministers stating that the
government should take up the matter of recusal with Hon'ble Justice
Bhandari "to avoid any room for questions to be raised once the
judgment is given in light of the already expressed opinions on IP".
The letter however added that given the manner in which those
conferences were "disguised as educational events, it is highly likely
that judges attending these meetings are unaware that these are not
neutral venues offering balanced views and discussions on IP". The
activists also clarified that "this is not a matter of transparency as
Hon'ble Justice Bhandari's Supreme Court web page and the Supreme Court
Annual Reports do note his participation at these conferences. Nor are
we in any way suggesting that this is a matter of corruption."
The signatories to the letter are Amit Sengupta (Delhi Science Forum),
B Ekbal (former vice chancellor of Kerala University), M R Santhosh
(Centre for Trade and Development), Prabir Purkayastha (Knowledge
Commons) and lawyer K M Gopakumar.
0 comments:
Post a Comment