इस ब्लाग में तलाशें

Showing posts with label sentence. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sentence. Show all posts

Thursday, 8 April 2010

Indian origin male nurse sentenced in Australia for sex with patient

An Indian-origin nurse, Kennedy Swamy, has been jailed for a maximum of three years for having sex with a patient with bipolar disorder at a Melbourne hospital last month. Swamy, who migrated to Australia from India in 2006, had pleaded guilty at the Victorian County Court to two charges of sexually penetrating a person with a cognitive impairment. He must serve a minimum of 15 months' jail before being eligible for parole.

Swamy was employed as a division two nurse at the health service at a Melbourne youth mental health service last year where he met an 18-year-old woman admitted with bipolar disorder. According to reports, the 29-year-old had sex with the patient in the bathroom on March 7 and again after two days. Judge Wendy Wilmoth at the Victorian County Court said the victim disclosed the sexual activity while participating in a therapy session the following day, saying at first she thought it was okay, but then realised it was wrong.

Judge Wilmoth said that due to her illness the victim's decision-making ability would have been severely impaired, and Swamy should have been aware from his training that sexual indiscretions were a breach of his duties.  "You breached the trust placed in you as a carer of a vulnerable person who was in a fragile state," News.com.au quoted Judge Wilmoth, as saying.

Read more...

Death sentence to 17 Indians challanged before Higher Court

An appeal was filed on Thursday on behalf of the 17 Indians who were recently found guilty by a Sharjah court of killing a Pakistani national and injuring three of his compatriots. The appeal was filed in a Sharjah Court of Appeals, India's Consul-General Sanjay Verma has said.

The Consulate had earlier said that they have hired a Dubai-based law firm, Mohamed Salman Advocates and Legal Consultants, to represent the Indians. Consulate officials had met all 17 Indians earlier this week and said that they were in good health. The convicted, 16 from the Punjab and one from Haryana, were recently found guilty by the Sharjah Court of killing a Pakistani national and injuring three of his compatriots allegedly during a clash in an illegal alcohol business in January 2009.  About 50 people were involved in the attack, in which the Pakistani man was beaten to death with metal bars. The men on death row are accused of being the gang leaders.

Read more...

Wednesday, 7 April 2010

High Court rejects premature release plea of Nalini

The Madras High Court on Tuesday held that the former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi assassination-case life-convict Nalini Sriharan who had committed the crime in a cunning and meticulous manner cannot seek premature release.A Division bench comprising Justice Elipe Dharma Rao and K K Sasidharan dismissed a plea of Nalini, a life convict in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case, seeking premature release under the general amnesty scheme.
While rejecting her petition, the bench observed that 44-year-old Nalini had committed the crime in a cunning and meticulous manner which killed the former Prime Minister in Sriperumbudur on May 21, 1991. “So she cannot seek premature release as a right, though she does have the right to seek consideration of her plea,” the Bench said.
“She had committed a crime which was cunning in conception, meticulous in plans and wreckless in execution, taking away the life of the former prime minister,” the judges held. In 2008, the High Court had rejected Nalini’s plea for release on the ground that her case was investigated by CBI under 435 of Cr PC, which says all cases probed by the central agency cannot be decided by the state without consulting the Central government. Nalini had filed her appeal contending that the Governor had powers under Article 161 of the Constitution, which the court rejected. She had filed the plea for her premature release in 2006, when 421 prisoners were released by the Governor exercising his powers under Article 161, contending she had already served 14 years in prison and was eligible for release.
The bench held that the governor had then exercised the powers granted to him under Article 161 judiciously.
Nalini had argued that just because CBI investigated her case, her plea for premature release was rejected. Noting that the nature of offence also played a major role in considering a case of premature release, the court said she could not claim equality with other life convicts.
"As a citizen of India the convict colluded with foreign terrorist out fit (LTTE) and killed the former Prime Minister of this country was unforgettable", the bench observed and said, once the capital punishment awarded to her by the trial court was confirmed by the Supreme Court and on a mercy the same was commuted to life is notable.

Read more...

Tuesday, 6 April 2010

Indian Govt. hired top lawyer in Dubai to file an appeal

The Centre has hired a top lawyer in Dubai to file an appeal against the death sentence to 17 Indians, minister of state for external affairs Preneet Kaur said on Monday. She assured a delegation of families of the convicts here that the government would do its best to ensure justice in the matter.


Preneet Kaur said the Indian consulate in Dubai had been sounded on the matter. The families interested in visiting their wards in Dubai would be granted visa relaxation, she said.

Sukhwinder Kaur, whose son Taranjeet (23) is among the 17 convicts, said the minister had assured them that special secretary, foreign affairs, would be sent to UAE to meet the convicts. “The government is making all efforts to help us,” she said.
Her son left for Dubai around one-and-a-half years back. “We only knew that Taranjeet was arrested on suspicion. Now he is facing death,” she said. Parminder Kaur, whose husband, Kashmir Singh, figures in the list of the 17 convicts, said they were shattered with the harsh sentence.

“We are exploring all options to save them and that’s why we met the minister. I am satisfied with the outcome of the meeting,” she said. Meanwhile, prayer meetings were held in Ludhiana and Jalandhar for the convicts’ well-being.

Read more...

Monday, 5 April 2010

Appeal against the death sentence to 17 Indians

The Indian Consulate in Dubai, in collaboration with Indian Association Sharjah an apex body of Indian welfare organisations will file an appeal within the next three days in the Sharjah Estinaf Court against the death sentence handed over to 17 Indians by a sharia court. The appeal process will be filed through Indian lawyers practising in the UAE.

Hashik PK, an Indian advocate closely associated with the appeals process, expressed confidence in saving the convicts from the gallows. “I am sure we can save our people. As some of the convicts had already confessed to the crime in the sharia court, we can get the death sentence converted to life imprisonment or even less. In the Estinaf Court, which is equal to our High Courts in India, the matter will be governed under criminal laws,” Hashik said over the phone.

“The death sentence was delivered by a religious court. In the appeal court, the rules are different. We will appeal the matter on question of fact and law, arguing that the incident was not at all a ‘rarest of rare’ case. Moreover, now we came to know that some of the persons had confessed. It is a mystery as to how a person who confesses can be given the death sentence. We will raise all these matters in the appeals process,” he added.

Explaining the legal process in Sharjah, Hashik said Estinaf Court judgements could be challenged in the Thamis Court, equivalent to a Supreme Court. “Only after the final legal battle and at the execution stage of the final verdict can the diplomatic channel act. Otherwise, it will be contempt of court. The diplomatic channel is out of the court’s purview and our Government has to appeal to the Ruler of Sharjah for the release of our citizens,” the advocate explained.

Describing the details of sharia laws, the advocate said the murdered Pakistani’s immediate relatives could also pardon the convicts with or without accepting “blood money”, which is considered a fine.

Indian Association Sharjah president YA Rahim, who is currently in India on vacation, also confirmed the developments in the appeals process. Rahim, who too is an advocate, squarely blamed the Indian Consulate for making things worse by not intervening when the Indians were jailed 15 months ago.

“These 17 persons were arrested on January 2009 and were in jail from day one. For the past 15 months, nobody from the consulate turned up. It was the duty of the Indian Consulate to intervene and provide legal assistance to them. The officials have started to act now, when things have gone out of control. Apart from Sharjah police, who informed them within 48 hours of the incident, we also informed them of the arrests. Moreover, this incident was widely reported in the media but nothing happened,” Rahim told The Pioneer.

The consulate failed to provide advocates and interpreters for the convicts in the trial stages. They were defended by a Government pleader provided by the court, where the proceedings were in the Arabic language, he pointed out.

Seventeen Indians 16 from Punjab and one from Haryana were awarded death on March 28 by the Sharjah sharia court for a street battle between bootleggers for supremacy in the area, leading to the murder of a Pakistani national. Nearly 70 Indians were arrested from the spot, but the others were let off from prison later.

Read more...

Blogger templates

  © Blogger template Newspaper III by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP